FREE month trial:https://buff.ly/2GNsNTv
For instance, back in September Cesar Azpilicueta has a goal ruled out due to Mason Mount’s foot being an inch offside a few passes back in the move. The wider media touted it harsh on Frank Lampard side as Liverpool scored two minutes after the incident. What was ignored was Liverpool’s defending of Chelsea’s chalked off goal which caught Mount offside. Because of the way the game unveiled it is an easy way of diminishing Liverpool’s defence efforts by stating they relied on VAR when their high line proved effective.The same happened with the Wolves goal on Sunday, when another marginal offside went Liverpool’s way but again it was the correct. In the aftermath of the Wolves backroom staff fuming, social media platforms were once again firing digs at Liverpool that VAR has benefitted them again.These sceptics will have not seen Pep Lijnders quotes on the importance of second phrases and the detail the coaching staff puts on them. Therefore, when Liverpool clear Wolves corner their set up is correct even in the fine details when a player in yellow’s toe is offside. Of course, the media is going to focus on how unfortunate Wolves were in having an equaliser ruled out but, by the offside law Jonny had the same advantage as someone with one leg offside.In one way it is understandable for fans to be irked by something they have not experienced in the game before in terms of VAR. Yet this cannot deceive people that a Liverpool side with an extensive lead at the top can be deemed lucky because of newly introduced technology. After all many were warning VAR would be a hinder in Liverpool’s pursuit the league title, not help them.By Jake Clay -@JakeClay17
