Their blueprint designed to turn supporters into customers once again struck a chord when the Super League proposal mentioned us match-going supporters as “legacy fans” and there has been some feelings that the club would very much prefer to be able to sell to the so called “day-trippers” if they could get away with it. The most high-profile incident has been the intention to charge £77 for match tickets which saw a large section of the stadium exit Anfield in February 2016 on the 77th minute in protest with black flags on the Kop as myself and several others chose to exit a game against Sunderland which Liverpool led 2-0 and ended up drawing 2-2. The reaction prompted the immediate retraction of £77 tickets and there has been no increase in admission prices since. They have also targeted a number of smaller enterprises to stop them using a Liverbird on products they sell with the distinct fear of legal action potentially instigated if they did not cease this but the most notable time of this was when they attempted to put a trademark on the name “Liverpool” in relation to football services which was quite rightly dropped and did not get approved by the IPO.It is very quick to simply accept an apology and carry on as normal. It is also very quick to call for them to sell up and move on but the grass isn’t always greener. The sums talked about for the club limit the number of serious investors. There is also no guarantee any new investor would uphold the club’s values or destroy the structure that has been put in place. The only guarantee is we acknowledge the apology and see what actions follow in support of this.So, what next?Written by: Matthew Purchase – @kopitesaint91Welcome to #LFC, Fabinho. ????https://t.co/Xd7ylCfnqJ pic.twitter.com/nYbV243DY5
— Liverpool FC (@LFC) May 28, 2018